'LinkedIn Inordinacy of Obeisance to Western acculturated Culturalism’© – NB: ‘Inordinacy of Obeisance’© per se, and ‘Western acculturated Culturalism’© per se


ba(goodhons-socsci)adv.dip(crim)cert(pri.res)mphil(pol&ir)


Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM

 

Background

 

I came across Notification on 17th June 2026 from LinkedIn of “Post removed for hateful speech” of my Blog https://ipemndohdaniyan.blogspot.com/2026/06/they-aint-hearing-us-because-they-aint.html posted on LinkedIn by Link and Blurb on the 16th or 17th of June 2026. LinkedIn supposedly gave me the Right of Appeal by asking me to click two or three Questions, after which LinkedIn came back to insist that my Post is still “hateful speech.” ‘Hateful’, whichever way you look at it, should and would demonstrate Malice or Offence or Spite. I have never known the Truth, more so “historical Truth,” to bear any of the foregoing nor can a Conclusion reached from ‘intellectual Pondering’© fall foul. Equally exempt from the Tarnish of “hateful speech” is Challenge to ‘cultural Indoctrination’©, not least the ‘Contradiction to West European cultural Indoctrination’© (‘West European cultural Indoctrination’© per se).

 

I found quite amusing what LinkedIn calls “Appeal.” It is absolutely ridiculous. Firstly; ticking Question Boxes is not “Appeal.” Secondly; and ordinarily, you cannot “appeal” against a ‘Blanket Charge’©. Thirdly; Charges to which you are appealing must be clearly stated in (a) Expression, (b) Effect, and (c) Impact. What is, really more demonstrative of muzzling me on LinkedIn, is that LinkedIn just decided what I posted by Link is “hateful speech” without the Courtesy of identifying to me how it is “hateful speech.” LinkedIn just issued a fiat, but hey, the United Kingdom (UK), which is my Home, is a “Civil Society.” What we do in Civil Societies are the following. (1) When we lay Errors against one another, we establish how the Errors we have laid against the Other offend us by (i) identifying what precisely in the Errors offend us, and (ii) the Manner in which they offend us, and (2) most importantly, whether these Errors are outside what could factually be proven away from ‘Sensitivity of Denial’© or ‘Sensitivity of Insensitivity’©. In a ‘well organised and pure Civil Society’© (‘pure Civil Society’© per se), we do not get to be the (a) Complainant, and (b) Jury, and (c) Judge, and (d) Executioner. All four Attributes LinkedIn assumed in this Case of declaring my Work as “hateful speech.” The UK is not a pure Civil Society, but it is Miles/Kilometres ahead of the Society LinkedIn emerged from; the United States of America, USA, especially as we now have the most ‘antithesis of a Human-Being’© Donald J. Trump Sr, as “President of the United States ... .” This most contemptible brings out the ‘hidden in the US Irrationality’© of all Sorts, and of those Nincompoops outside the US who buy into the Irrationality.

 

‘The Master still expects the Dance to the drumming’©

 

I know what I wrote in that Blog I posted on LinkedIn by Link. It is essentially my Condemnation of the Effects of Western Acculturations on African Peoples transferred by ‘Western doctrinaire Supremacy’© (‘doctrinaire Supremacy’© per se) through ‘racial-Slavery’© cum ‘racial-Colonisation’©, and the ‘Gene infected Refusal’© also ‘Gene explicatory Refusal’© of Africans in Today’s ‘Modern Enlightenment Era’© to stop the ‘unquestioned Digestion’© of Western Acculturation. That Blog, unequivocally denounced ‘Western acculturated Culturalism’© by Africans known or unbeknown to Africans themselves. How such an ‘intellectual Challenge’© to West European Cultural Imperialism could ever equate to “hateful speech” is very obvious to me. It is “hateful speech” because someone in Anonymity at LinkedIn in ‘Imperialist Umbrage’© found it unacceptable that Ipemndoh dan Iyan, of (the) African Race, identified the ‘highly reprehensible Ingestion by Africans of West European Cultural Propaganda’© (‘reprehensible Ingestion’© per se), and condemned their ‘unquestioning Self-Acculturation’© (‘Self-Acculturation per se) of this ‘Imperialist cultural Propaganda’© especially its Misrepresentation of Judaeo-Christianity that itself took Root in Africa, ‘appropriated and falsely claimed’© by East Europeans (Judaism (Jew)), and West Europeans (Christianity (Christian)). Please, see my https://ipemndohdaniyan.blogspot.com/2026/06/africans-and-lying-to-themselves.html for my Interpretation of “Culture,” “cultural,” et cetera.

 

This LinkedIn Complainant, and (b) Jury, and (c) Judge, and (d) Executioner certainly dismissed my academic Qualification of “Master of Philosophy” (MPhil/PhM) which is quite weighty for, and to anyone who knows the Value of Education, and which should make that anyone read closely what a Holder of that Qualification writes. I know that LinkedIn cannot ‘evidentially sustain’© the Nonsense of “hateful speech.” It is a red herring for someone probably pursuing own Agendum. This LinkedIn “hateful speech” Judgment is ‘intelligently unsound’© not to talk of being of any intellectual Merit. “Intelligent” features in my “intelligently unsound” only because the Notion of “hateful speech” came from Sound Minds thus intelligent Minds, but LinkedIn’s Recourse to this ordinarily ‘intelligent Conception’© is incompetent. It is “intellectually untenable.” So, LinkedIn engages in ‘publishing Antagonism’© against, and of, an African’s ‘Identification of West European cultural Indoctrination of the African’© (‘West European cultural Indoctrination of the African’© per se). Bravo, but is it not the Case that s/he “who feels it knows it?”

 

‘What you own or control is the Extent of your Determination’©

 

LinkedIn desires to muzzle me on LinkedIn. Elon Musk’s “X”  has done it https://ipemndohdaniyan.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-exclusionary-closure-that-elon.html, but do I care? Ergo, I am okay with LinkedIn’s Adventure in View of my ‘Principle of Proprietorship’©. LinkedIn owns LinkedIn. It can decide what it wants, and what it does not want on LinkedIn. That is Control. As it is now obvious LinkedIn does not want certain of what I write to be distributed on LinkedIn, I can take a Walk, and I have, actually, walked away from LinkedIn, believe me. Since the 17th of June 2026 when I got the offensive, delusional, and hallucinatory Notice from LinkedIn, I have not placed any Writing on LinkedIn except for the Open Letter to my Followers I would be posting before or after publishing this Blog.

 

LinkedIn Interference intolerable

 

LinkedIn interfering with my Work on LinkedIn is not for me a Question of the Right to “Freedom of Speech” or the wider “Freedom of Expression.” I have always held that the Duty to afford the Person those Rights is ‘formally incumbent’© on Governments, and ‘Government Apparatus(es)’©, and ‘Business Entanglement(s)’©, and Employment Relations. Any Entitlement to these Freedoms between Persons are transactional, as they are ‘quid pro quo Entitlement(s)’© insofar as these Transactions do not break the “Laws of Sensibility” (legal, moral, and social). There are bad Laws, you know. Thus, it ain’t mandatory for LinkedIn to grant me these Rights. I either get them from conducive Platforms or I create own Platform(s).

 

What LinkedIn cannot do, however, is determine my academic Work as “hateful speech” without Substance(s). The Substances include the following Questions: (1) how educated is the Person making that Determination, (2) is s/he an academic Philosopher as Ipemndoh dan Iyan with MPhil/PhM (two years full time or part time equivalent Research Degree or the ‘prima facie superior’© DPhil/PhD), (3) what are the Pieces of Evidence supporting the Accusation of “hateful speech,” as especially, LinkedIn is the Complainant, Jury, Judge, and Executioner over Ipemndoh dan Iyan’s Challenge, as an African, to the ‘Western Europe Structure of Humanity’© (‘Structure of Humanity’© per se)? It ain’t happening, just because I use the LinkedIn Platform to distribute my Thinking. LinkedIn cannot cast my Thinking as it wishes, particularly as it is doing it in Anonymity. I do not know the Names of the Person making that Determination and/or that Person’s best academic Accomplishment. It is cowardly of that Person. Let me know you, and let me know what you are, intelligently. (Education, and Entrepreneurship are the ‘true Measures of Intelligence Level(s)’© (‘Measures of Intelligence Level(s)© per se). The Anonymity, and Cowardice of that Person are the other Reasons for my writing this Blog originally as Open Letter to those who followed me on LinkedIn, and to whom I reciprocated. I am a Westerner, but I am of the African Race. No other Westerner, especially of the Abusers of my Ancestors, muzzles me from exploring the many Experiences of Abuse of Africans to advocate and/or teach Self-Recognition. Note: West European, Western Europe, Western are interchangeable to large Extents.

 

LinkedIn does not validate me and can never validate me. Please, let me rephrase. LinkedIn does not substantiate me. I substantiated myself, and my superiors in academic Accomplishments recognised my Relevance, and made me visible to the Level of Prominence that surpasses even the Recognitions of some of them. My University published my Master of Philosophy (MPhil/PhM) Dissertation. Not even a lot of Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil/PhD) Dissertations get published by awarding Universities. So, why would I tolerate anyone from LinkedIn, probably so beneath my Education and/or academically irrelevant to determine me and/or what I write? I am so incensed that a Person of this likelihood would assume Superiority over me. I do not believe that anyone at LinkedIn has the ‘academic wherewithal’© or “discursive Integrity,” or ‘sheer Cognisance’© to arrogate Importance to the Self over what I write. Listen, whoever you are, come out into the Open, and let us identify your Merit. As bad as it is, even today, we are no longer in “Plantation Times” when Brutality reigned rather than ‘Refinement of Mind(s)’©. Let me know you, and your academic Merit(s).

 

I find Human-Beings, including myself, quite interesting, very amusing actually. We collectively through our several Participations validate Social Media like Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter-X, and the Like, yet they turn it around as if they are the Imperatives in our Lives. Imagine if Twitter were to pay me, even if only, 1 Cent for the over 250 Million Impressions of my Tweets in 28 Days as I evidenced here https://ipemndohdaniyan.blogspot.com/2025/02/the-exclusionary-closure-that-elon.html, i.e.? Has any social Media User ever asked to see the marketing Strategy of the Platform s/he uses to understand how Member Figures, Contributions, and Participations underpin the Survivability of these social Media? (‘Media’ is plural for ‘Medium’, so “medias” is most awful English).

 

Emphatically, I am absenting myself from LinkedIn. I was already publishing Online, probably about 10 Years, before LinkedIn came along. I know how to find my way. I have only been very lazy by tagging onto Social Media. It has taken me this long to publish this Blog, as I have been waiting for LinkedIn to let me download my Data, but the only Response Link I got from LinkedIn did not give me Access to full Retrieval. I wonder why that is, as I made my Request on 19 June 2026, and I am publishing today 14 July 2026. I drafted this Piece on 20 June 2026.

 

I await no longer, but I leave my Account undeleted on, and with LinkedIn lest LinkedIn returned with the Excuse that my deleting my Account stopped my downloading of my Data on, and with LinkedIn.

 

Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM©

AsimauGlobalMedia© 

All Rights 2026

14 July

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

So far, so good, Trump Sr’s Terrorism and Hooliganism against Venezuela

Ye pa, E gba mi o – Nigerian Army Brigadier-General captured by “Terrorists” and later murdered

Ye, all you Christians, thou shall kill all those who kill Christians