South Africa will not be receiving an invitation to the 2026 G20 – Donald J. Trump Sr the Imbecile is at it again
https://share.google/2dk9EQbsrFwoWVieo
– “... at my direction, South Africa will NOT be receiving an invitation to the
2026 G20, which will be hosted in the Great City of Miami, Florida next year,”
so declared 'A wo su kun ti o wo Arare re ni a wo re rin’ Donald J. Trump Sr,
the President of the United States of America (‘POTUSA’©).
The ‘Deficit of the American
Republic’©: Donald J. Trump Sr as President
How
could a ‘cognitively underdeveloped’© bipedal like Donald J. Trump Sr become
the President of any Country in the World, let alone becoming it twice? Only
‘Electoral Politics’ propagandized as “Democracy” can enable such Aberration.
Donald
J. Trump Sr is just mad, “undeniably sick” in the Head, stark raving Maniac. So
self-important. As, he has personally never achieved; an ordinary bachelor's
degree, inherited Fortune that he elbowed other Family Members out of, and deployed
fraudulent Means to boost, if at all boosted, and Presidencies given to him by
Electorates largely uneducated, he has this very conspicuous Chip on his
Shoulder. He is very angry at himself for own ‘enduring Insufficiency’©, and
the only Way to prove himself worthy is to abuse the Office of POTUSA. Such an
'infantile Adult'© he is. The more he throws his Weight around, the clearer he
tells the World how much of the Bully he is, contemptuous of “societal
Sensitivities,” and who also never understands the basic Expectations of World
Affairs (global Matters).
South
Africa in Africa, from Africa, is a permanent Member of G20. The United States
of America (USA) is also a permanent Member of G20. No such Member of G20 can
invite or not invite another Member to G20 Summits. That the US is the ‘hosting
Member’© of the 2026 G20 Summit does not, in any way, give POTUSA Donald J.
Trump Sr the Liberty to exclude any other Member from attending the Summit under
any USA Policy. Trump Sr’s Imbecility here has been appropriately responded to
by “South Africa’s presidential spokesman Vincent Magwenya” who warned him that
“if visas [to the 2026 G20 Summit in the
USA] are denied ... we will have to move on and look beyond the G20 in the US.”
As, Donald J. Trump Sr is not only an ‘infantile Adult’©, but also arrogant
despite it, he would not understand the Implication that the 2026 G20 Summit
will be re-located from the US. I suspect that there is Provision in the G20
Regime that caters for such Response to the Sort of Lunacy being displayed by
Trump Sr.
Similar Donald J. Trump Sr Derangement
in the Case of Colombia
US
revokes Colombian president's visa after UN visit - BBC News https://share.google/7knFtUsmHRHiShasl
Donald
J. Trump Sr's lack of proper Education is simply nauseating, and compounded by equally
uneducated Opinions from Reporters is simply exasperating. Reporters should
report, not comment on what they are reporting, especially when they do not
have the slightest Understanding of what they are commenting about.
The
first Paragraph of the above Report read: (1) “the US has said it will revoke Colombian President Gustavo
Petro’s visa after he urged US soldiers to disobey his American counterpart
Donald Trump during remarks at a rally in New York.” In the last Paragraph, the two Authors of the
Report capped it with: (2) “the
US also denied visas for Mahmoud Abass, the Palestinian president ... (3) despite world leaders conventionally
being permitted to attend the body’s [United Nations] headquarters regardless of
their relations with the US.”
When
someone as myself, an academic Expert in the United Nations Organisation (UNO)
with Speciality in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), integrates those
three Pieces of Information, these two Journalists of the British Broadcasting
Corporation (BBC) have misled their Audience(s), perhaps
without Intention, but certainly from Ignorance. One;
Colombia is a Member of the UNO. Two; Palestine is not
a Member of the UNO. It is an Observer. Three; the US cannot
“revoke” the US Visa of any Representative of a Member State on US Soil on UN
official Business. Abbas can be denied a Visa by US
Authorities because Palestine is not yet a
‘geographic Legal Identity’© to be admitted into the Membership of the UNO. Capisci?
It was quite unfortunate the BBC Journalists deployed the Expression “despite world leaders conventionally
being permitted to attend [UNO’s] headquarters.” The Issue is not a Question
of Permission. It is Duty under Law; “international
Law.” I refer those two Journalists, and the World to Sections 11, and 13,
i.e., of:
UNITED NATIONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Agreement
regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success, on 26
June 1947, and approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations, on 31
October 1947, with an Exchange of Notes, dated 21 November 1947, bringing this
Agreement into effect.
United States of America: the
Leech on the UNO
Of
the rich Countries in the World, the USA is the most shameless ‘parasitic Member’©
of the UNO usually called the “United Nations” or “UN.” In 2002 when I (I.P., dan Iyan) submitted https://share.google/e8cnpvPuBReyQgekf,
the US was (i) the most indebted Country to the UNO, (ii) the ‘everlasting
Beneficiary’© of the UNO, and (iii) the shameful ‘Antithesis to global Peace
and Security’©, and (iv) the ‘complete Mercenary’© reliant on ‘UN(O) Validation’©.
... as argued in the preceding
chapters, UNSC peacekeeping activities have been predicated substantially on
advancing US interests. Chapter five, in particular, argued that the US
continued presence in the UNSC is guided by the Weinberger Doctrine, DPG 1994-1999,
and PDD 25. Chapter five also showed that the US economy benefits from UN
expenditure by more than two and half times the US financial contributions to
the UN. If the US does not regard the UNSC as beneficial to its interests, the
US would leave that Organ as it left the United Nations Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). ... US withdrawal of payment to
UN coffers amounts to an attitude of incorrigible indebtedness. [See lately in
2025 “Trump starves U.N. of funding, as global body faces cash crunch - The
Washington Post https://share.google/8Y5xuDcANWXJQEXsx”].
At the end of August 1994, assessed
contributions owed the UN were over $3.2 billion. Over $1 billion
($1,502,232,551) of this was owed by the US. As of February 1999, the UN was
owed $2.9 billion out of which the US total debt stood at $1.69 billion; $620
million for the regular budget, and $1.07 billion for peacekeeping and
international tribunals. These debts amounted to twothirds of all the current debts
to the Organisation. According to UN latest records, the US debts were still
outstanding on September 1, 1999.
The US itself, in a testimony given
by Madeline Albright before a Senate Hearing, confirmed, for instance, that in
1994 the UN purchase of US ‘goods and services’ in 1993 was over one-third of
the UN ‘procurement for peacekeeping’. Even the expense of the Gulf conflict
was borne almost entirely by other members of the Coalition, and not the US [Operation
Desert Shield/Storm: Costs and Funding Requirements - Report to the Chairman,
Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, United States General Accounting
Office, September 1991].
Ipemndoh dan Iyan
PhM©
AsimauGlobalMedia©
All Rights 2025
28 November
Comments
Post a Comment