South Africa will not be receiving an invitation to the 2026 G20 – Donald J. Trump Sr the Imbecile is at it again


Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM 


https://share.google/2dk9EQbsrFwoWVieo – “... at my direction, South Africa will NOT be receiving an invitation to the 2026 G20, which will be hosted in the Great City of Miami, Florida next year,” so declared 'A wo su kun ti o wo Arare re ni a wo re rin’ Donald J. Trump Sr, the President of the United States of America (‘POTUSA’©).

 

The ‘Deficit of the American Republic’©: Donald J. Trump Sr as President

 

How could a ‘cognitively underdeveloped’© bipedal like Donald J. Trump Sr become the President of any Country in the World, let alone becoming it twice? Only ‘Electoral Politics’ propagandized as “Democracy” can enable such Aberration.

 

Donald J. Trump Sr is just mad, “undeniably sick” in the Head, stark raving Maniac. So self-important. As, he has personally never achieved; an ordinary bachelor's degree, inherited Fortune that he elbowed other Family Members out of, and deployed fraudulent Means to boost, if at all boosted, and Presidencies given to him by Electorates largely uneducated, he has this very conspicuous Chip on his Shoulder. He is very angry at himself for own ‘enduring Insufficiency’©, and the only Way to prove himself worthy is to abuse the Office of POTUSA. Such an 'infantile Adult'© he is. The more he throws his Weight around, the clearer he tells the World how much of the Bully he is, contemptuous of “societal Sensitivities,” and who also never understands the basic Expectations of World Affairs (global Matters).

 

South Africa in Africa, from Africa, is a permanent Member of G20. The United States of America (USA) is also a permanent Member of G20. No such Member of G20 can invite or not invite another Member to G20 Summits. That the US is the ‘hosting Member’© of the 2026 G20 Summit does not, in any way, give POTUSA Donald J. Trump Sr the Liberty to exclude any other Member from attending the Summit under any USA Policy. Trump Sr’s Imbecility here has been appropriately responded to by “South Africa’s presidential spokesman Vincent Magwenya” who warned him that  “if visas [to the 2026 G20 Summit in the USA] are denied ... we will have to move on and look beyond the G20 in the US.” As, Donald J. Trump Sr is not only an ‘infantile Adult’©, but also arrogant despite it, he would not understand the Implication that the 2026 G20 Summit will be re-located from the US. I suspect that there is Provision in the G20 Regime that caters for such Response to the Sort of Lunacy being displayed by Trump Sr.

 

Similar Donald J. Trump Sr Derangement in the Case of Colombia

US revokes Colombian president's visa after UN visit - BBC News https://share.google/7knFtUsmHRHiShasl 

 

Donald J. Trump Sr's lack of proper Education is simply nauseating, and compounded by equally uneducated Opinions from Reporters is simply exasperating. Reporters should report, not comment on what they are reporting, especially when they do not have the slightest Understanding of what they are commenting about.

 

The first Paragraph of the above Report read: (1) the US has said it will revoke Colombian President Gustavo Petro’s visa after he urged US soldiers to disobey his American counterpart Donald Trump during remarks at a rally in New York.  In the last Paragraph, the two Authors of the Report capped it with: (2) “the US also denied visas for Mahmoud Abass, the Palestinian president ... (3) despite world leaders conventionally being permitted to attend the body’s [United Nations] headquarters regardless of their relations with the US.”

 

When someone as myself, an academic Expert in the United Nations Organisation (UNO) with Speciality in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), integrates those three Pieces of Information, these two Journalists of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) have misled their Audience(s), perhaps without Intention, but certainly from Ignorance. One; Colombia is a Member of the UNO. Two; Palestine is not a Member of the UNO. It is an Observer. Three; the US cannot “revoke” the US Visa of any Representative of a Member State on US Soil on UN official Business. Abbas can be denied a Visa by US Authorities because Palestine is not yet a ‘geographic Legal Identity’© to be admitted into the Membership of the UNO. Capisci? It was quite unfortunate the BBC Journalists deployed the Expression “despite world leaders conventionally being permitted to attend [UNO’s] headquarters.” The Issue is not a Question of Permission. It is Duty under Law; “international Law.” I refer those two Journalists, and the World to Sections 11, and 13, i.e., of:

 

UNITED NATIONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success, on 26 June 1947, and approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations, on 31 October 1947, with an Exchange of Notes, dated 21 November 1947, bringing this Agreement into effect.

 

United States of America: the Leech on the UNO

 

Of the rich Countries in the World, the USA is the most shameless ‘parasitic Member’© of the UNO usually called the “United Nations” or “UN.”  In 2002 when I (I.P., dan Iyan) submitted  https://share.google/e8cnpvPuBReyQgekf, the US was (i) the most indebted Country to the UNO, (ii) the ‘everlasting Beneficiary’© of the UNO, and (iii) the shameful ‘Antithesis to global Peace and Security’©, and (iv) the ‘complete Mercenary’© reliant on ‘UN(O) Validation’©.

 

... as argued in the preceding chapters, UNSC peacekeeping activities have been predicated substantially on advancing US interests. Chapter five, in particular, argued that the US continued presence in the UNSC is guided by the Weinberger Doctrine, DPG 1994-1999, and PDD 25. Chapter five also showed that the US economy benefits from UN expenditure by more than two and half times the US financial contributions to the UN. If the US does not regard the UNSC as beneficial to its interests, the US would leave that Organ as it left the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). ... US withdrawal of payment to UN coffers amounts to an attitude of incorrigible indebtedness. [See lately in 2025 “Trump starves U.N. of funding, as global body faces cash crunch - The Washington Post https://share.google/8Y5xuDcANWXJQEXsx”].

 

At the end of August 1994, assessed contributions owed the UN were over $3.2 billion. Over $1 billion ($1,502,232,551) of this was owed by the US. As of February 1999, the UN was owed $2.9 billion out of which the US total debt stood at $1.69 billion; $620 million for the regular budget, and $1.07 billion for peacekeeping and international tribunals. These debts amounted to twothirds of all the current debts to the Organisation. According to UN latest records, the US debts were still outstanding on September 1, 1999.

 

The US itself, in a testimony given by Madeline Albright before a Senate Hearing, confirmed, for instance, that in 1994 the UN purchase of US ‘goods and services’ in 1993 was over one-third of the UN ‘procurement for peacekeeping’. Even the expense of the Gulf conflict was borne almost entirely by other members of the Coalition, and not the US [Operation Desert Shield/Storm: Costs and Funding Requirements - Report to the Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, United States General Accounting Office, September 1991].

 

Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM©

AsimauGlobalMedia© 

All Rights 2025

28 November 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It has always been there, that excellent Mind

The ‘Paper Tiger’ at it again: Idiots simply never learn

The exclusionary Closure that Elon Musk’s X is and the Polity of the United States of America