Africans and their ‘primordial own Interest’©
Commenting
on https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GLB1VDwFA/
A “Comment”
to a “Comment” became a short Blog
A “Comment”
to https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1GLB1VDwFA/ asked:
“What if they are spies?” I responded
with: “apt Question to ask. It is one unfortunate Step Ibrahim Traoré has taken
or allowed to be taken on his Behalf. These Persons are of 'recent African
Heritage'(RAH)'©, after all. Treachery against our own for personal Gain is our
Blood. If there are no "spies" among them today, there will be
tomorrow. I can bet my Life on that. The African is own Enemy. Enemy of, and
to, own Emancipation”©. Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM
The Treachery of the African against
the African: the Modalities
The Treachery of the African (RAH Person) against the
African (RAH Person) for personal Gain relies essentially on
personal Gain for the Perpetrator. This Treachery follows a familiar ‘Pattern
of Rigidity’©(PoR), that is, an invariable Pattern except for situational actioning.
The ‘Outsider-Race Interest’© (ORI), i.e., a “white” Government, “Supremacists
by Default,” would go at any ‘African intended-cooperative Facility’© (‘intended-cooperative
Facility’©, per se) or ‘African intended-harmonising Facility’© (‘intended-harmonising
Facility’©, per se) in the predictable 5-Part Course
– ‘5-Modalities’© – completely
or selectively. First; the ORI would either send in
an Agent of RAH Identity to infiltrate the Facility and/or openly
connive with a RAH Government or RAH Person(s) to publicly
antagonise the Facility. Second; that ORI Agent of
RAH Identity would introduce an Agendum to the Facility contrived
together with her/his “white” Handlers. Third; the “white” Handlers
would commence anticipating – with “subtle Propaganda” – the Facility
of potential Harm to the World through criticising
the Agendum they bequeathed the Facility by Way of their Agent of RAH Identity.
This Harm described – not even explained – by the ORI, would be devised
by the ORI Agency itself, what is now specifically ‘White Supremacy Government Initiator’©
(WSGI) (‘White Supremacy Government’© (WSG), per se). Fourth;
if the RAH Facility has a strong
Presence in the World, i.e., global Visibility with Authority, the WSGI would
begin to demonize the Facility. Fifth; the
Demonization of the Facility would naturally lead to the WSGI’s Extermination
of the Facility, most probably in “Coalition” with other WSGs, and of course,
backed by RAH Governments which have recognized the personal Pockets of their thieving
Members as better served by the WSG or WSGs. Clarity now; the Person of RAH Identity is own Enemy?
However, this 5-Part PoR itself is the Blueprint for own Breakage if RAH
Peoples are conscious, and cognizant of the ‘Imperative(s)
of Existence’© of the African Race. The 5-Part PoR embodies own ‘Process(es) of
Asphyxiation’© (PoA). Please, note that I have deployed “Facility” in a
fundamental Meaning of ‘Mechanism for achieving an Objective’©.
The Treachery of the African (RAH
Person) against the African (RAH Person) for personal Gain is “Human Nature”
lest those not of the African Race rejoice.
Yeah, yeah, Geneticists, and misguided Social Scientists
insist that “Race” to qualify or “separate” Homosapiens is a “Social
Construct,” but I wonder how “Man,” “Person,” “Woman,” or however else we
identify the Bipedal Entity who talks, is not socially constructed. Anyway,
this is by the way. ‘Personal Gain’ can be individual as well as grouped.
‘Personal Gain’ at Face Value is individual. However, ‘persona Gain’ can still
be achieved within ‘Group Gain’© aka collective Gain.
‘From Statis to Perennialism’©
The psychological Motivation of
‘personal Gain’ or ‘self Interest’ is “Survival,” and only few Humans are
outside the Clutch of this “primordial State” of ‘each for own Interest’©. Of
course, when I say (or write) “few,” I use the Word comparably to the Billions
we are on Earth. It is this “Survival Instinct” that pulled, and
paradoxically also pushed, the early Movements from Africa to go
populate the rest of the World. It is the same “Survival Instinct” that made
the Inflows adapt to the new Environments they found themselves
in. Their Genes shed the biological Compositions from Africa not
useful, in fact detrimental, in those new Environments (and alas,
the taxonomic Usefulness of “Race” began to actualize). Those
Processes of (i) moving in huge Droves to
populate new Environments, and (ii) conquering the Ravages of the
new Environments they found themselves in, engendered a new Expression
of personal Gain/Self Interest. It was ‘personal Gain in Group Interest’©. To
survive in the new unfamiliar Conditions, the ‘primordial own Interest’© had to
be abandoned. It was not negotiable.
Those ‘early Nomad(s) from
Africa’© (‘early Nomad(s)’© per se) recognized the Necessity to
discard their individual ‘personal Gain’, and encase it within the Pursuit of
the ‘Group Gain’, the ‘Collective Gain’, to survive in the unfamiliar Terrains
they found themselves. The Experiences of these ‘early Nomads from Africa’ were, a priori, beyond the
Imaginations of those who stayed behind, the ‘in situ African(s)’©. Geneticists,
and Biologists in general have either suggested or claimed that Behaviours are
somehow transformed into Genes or adapted into Genes. I think Social Scientists
too have postulated similarly or am I the first Social Scientist doing so, and
here? At any rate, it makes Sense that Behaviours would translate into Genes. ‘Behavio(u)r
is Demonstration of Attitude’©, that is, the Attitudes of a Person determine the
many Behaviors of that Person. This Proposition of Attitude controlling Behaviour
is ‘ordinarily articulable’© if you are One like me. The Attitude itself is a
Product of the Genes. Have I not ‘intellectually contradict(ed)’© myself positing
that Genes conceive Attitudes while Attitudes influence Behaviours, but
Behaviours can create Genes? Not at all, not if I suspect that the Process
between Attitude and Behavior is not always unidirectional, but fundamentally vice
versa albeit to varying degrees. In fact, I find the Logic of the ‘vice
versa Exchange of Attitude and Behavio(u)r’© quite Sound. While conceptualising
this Frame of ‘Genes – Attitudes – Behaviours – Genes’© and after already making
my preceding Argument, I went Online, as I always do, to investigate whether
someone has beaten me to the Argument, and I came across https://share.google/txVtM5Dswj2VWmVNf, today 5 November 2025. It is
not the only Paper I found, but they all made the same Argument in different
Forms, including using the same Word of “bidirectional” with or without “relationship.”
I had, myself, used those Words in this Write-up before encountering their
Commonality in discussing the same Topic. So, I substituted ‘bidirectional’
with ‘vice versa’. Importantly, however,
it appears I am the only Social Scientist/Philosopher postulating the ‘Genes –
Attitudes – Behaviours – Genes’ Cycle.
The ‘in situ African Gene(s)’© have
not moved beyond Composition for primordial own
Interest. This is why the ‘racial-Slavery’© of the African could happen with
the African as the ‘indispensable Chaperone’©.
It is also the Reason for the ‘racial-Colonization’© of the African Continent with
‘obsessive Enforcement’© by the African, and ‘submissive Implementation’© from
the African. The ‘in situ African Genes’ have never had the (a) Benefit of metamorphosing
into other Races, and (b) Reliance on and Trust
in the Collectivity of the Group to survive the Metamorphosis. The ‘in situ Africans’
did not have the ‘philosophical Wherewithal’© that when you remove from the
Group, that Group is weakened, and that you do not pull out only physically,
but also morally even when you are physically present.
Of course, we are aware of the
practical Implications of subtracting from a Collection. The philosophical
Implication is to be able to perceive further than the obvious, to anticipate
possible and probable future Outcomes of today’s Undertakings. It is when you engage
in ‘philosophical Pondering(s)’© that you would realize Treachery is ‘Moral
Withdrawal’©. My ‘philosophical Wherewithal’ here is not an Issue of Cognition
– it can be used in various Circumstances, and including Cognition, quite all
right – as I could easily have deployed the common saying of “the Benefit of
Hindsight.” The Experiences of migrating from Africa to other Parts of the
World, adapting, and transforming into other Physiognomies, Physiques, and all
which make the ‘regional Distinction(s)’© between Homosapiens forged the
Rationality of collective Gain that etched itself into Memory inserted into a
Gene or converted into a Gene. The closest Analogy I can give is: you got into
a quicksand once, and you learn. That first time you dropped in you did not
have a Clue what it was. Now, you know what it is. It is not about Cognition,
but Experience. Until the ‘RAH People’© get rid of that ‘primordial own
Interest’ Gene, we remain ‘collectively wretched’©.
Ipemndoh dan Iyan
PhM©
AsimauGlobalMedia©
All Rights 2025
31 October – 15 November
Comments
Post a Comment