Racism is not about your Birth: it is everything to do with your cognitive Complexity, Stupid

Ipemndoh dan Iyan

Royalty does not lie. The Monarchy cannot be underhanded. A King or a Queen will not be dubious. Why? The Sovereign is above Errancy. S/he is a god or a goddess. See? In these modern Times there are those yet to emerge from the dark Ages. They are the unevolved, cognitively and morally. Ipemndoh dan Iyan©

UK Royals cannot be racist. After all, it is the Monarchy we are talking about here. Much stupid Defence/Defense. Absolute Delusional Absolution. Racism is not about how high or low you are born. The real Issue is your Mindset. The Racial-Slavery of Africans and the Racial-Colonization of Africa tell us this much about the Occidental ('White') Racist represented in the 'White' Slaver; Plantation Owners and Plantation Overseers alike. Our Mindsets illustrate how morally-normative we are. The Mindset demonstrates how mentally-evolved a Human-Being we can be seen to be. Our Mindsets are our Human Maps for the World to navigate to discover how far or how near the primordial Stage of the Human the Maturity of our Brain(s).  

During the Racial-Slavery of Africans and the Racial-Colonization of Africa, European Monarchs convinced themselves of  their hallucinatory Belief of racial-Superiority to Africans. Occidental Thinkers and Writers propounded Arguments with false Evidence - manufactured either by deliberate Manipulation of Evidence or by simply inventing Evidence - to maintain this Delusion of superior Race. Hailing themselves "White" was not only Continuation of their Fantasy of being the superior Race, it also was (1) to deny their racial Relationship to other Caucasian Types and (2) to distinguish their Subset as the One with Power over the Rest of the World. Their wider Populations, largely illiterate, became intoxicated by the Opportunity of finally finding in enslaved and colonized Africans, Human Beings they could treat as woefully as they were treated by their ruling Classes. They could now point to those Africans as inferior Versions of their pitiful Selves. After all, from the lowliest of them to the highest of them, they did with the African Slave - even after s/he was supposedly emancipated during the 'American' Civil War - whatever they had in their Minds to do. So, they had to have been the super-Race. Some of them still hold onto this Nonsense of a superior Race. It really was self-deceiving. Being Occidental is not a racial Description but a Separation into a Subset of the racial Typology of 'Caucasoid'/'Caucasian'.

If the Slavery of Africans did not convince the Occidental Ethnicity of its Superiority over the African Race, after all, it was not able to capture Africans as Slaves without the Assistance and full Participation of other Africans, the Colonization of Africa was more than enough Proof. The Fact that Africans again assisted this Ethnicity on the Continent to oppress and suppress other Africans simply emphasised the biological Superiority of 'white' Folks. "If Africans were not really mentally inferior, how could we continue to dominate them even on their Lands with the ready Willingness of their own People", the Colonizers would have rationalized. Today, Scores of Years after Decolonization, 'white' Folks' Ideal is the self-determined Benchmark for African Enlightenment and Emancipation. So, why should a 'white' Person, even those who can hardly read or write, not continue today to believe s/he is more intellectually-able than a highly educated Person of Recent African Origin (RAO)?1 

Typically, certain 'White' Academics and their Regurgitators-Understudy of African Origins and other Writers of Like-Mind suggested and continue to push the Fallacy that the Civil War of 12 April 1861 to 9 April 1865 was about the Freedom of African Slaves and that there is something called the 'Emancipation Proclamation' declared by Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States of America (USA/US). First, Lincoln titled his Declaration simply as 'A Proclamation'. He was not intent on deceiving anyone as to the Extent of his Promulgation. How it came to be revised as "Emancipation Proclamation" I do not know. Certainly, this re-christening could not have come from an intelligent Mind. Lincoln's Proclamation internally was clear that he was concerned with releasing from Slavery the Slaves held by the Confederacy - the secessionist States. It was a strategic Move, as many have observed before me, to assist the Union's War Efforts. He did not care to free the Slaves held in the Union States. Thus, defining the Lincoln Mandate as an "Emancipation Proclamation" defied its Contents in deliberately misleading Scholarship. The Civil War was prosecuted primarily over the continuing Union - Indivisibility - of the US and the Role of the Economy based on Slavery in sustaining that Union. Second, those who have read Lincoln's Notes leading to his 'A Proclamation' of 22 September 1862 signed on 1 January 1863, would fully realize the Relevance of that Document in 'American' History. I have read both the Notes and the Declaration. Many Times, in fact.2

The Barbarism of Occidental Racism from premodern (early modern) History to contemporary Times is still in Place, no matter how subtle. That this has always been manifest - not 'manifested' - in the lowliest-born to the highest-born, is a priori. In these Times though, Racism is as much of a Mindset as it is a Matter, firmly, of low Cognition in Racists. The Mindset is the Illusion of racial-Superiority - not quite racial actually, but ethnic - and the low Cognition displayed by/in the Inability to reason. Our Racists are not "ignorant". The Excuse of "Ignorance" we could accept for the Slavery and Colonization Periods as the largest Proportions of Occidental Populations were illiterate and ipso facto uneducated about the World beyond their Experiences. These Days the Excuse of "Ignorance" cannot wash. We now have wide-ranging sources of Information from which illiterates can learn from non-illiterates. No; our 'White' Racists are simply bereft of the cognitive Capability to take in Facts, examine these Facts, identify Consistencies or Contradictions in those Facts to arrive at considered Opinions from such Facts. Yes, our Racists do not have the intellectual Wherewithal to think as Homosapiens. Ergo, they are disadvantaged to remain in their savage States, unable to reverse and revise their primitive Understanding of the Human Species. Let us take, for example, the 1964 general Elections in Smethwick, West Midlands.  Conservative Peter Griffith won that Seat from its sitting Member of the House of Commons since 1945, the Labour Party's Patrick Chrestien Gordon Walker (Baron Gordon-Walker), with a 7.2% Swing. Was that Swing not made up mostly of Labour Party Voters? Two Years previously, Baron Gordon-Walker had opposed the Conservative Party Government's Commonwealth Immigration Act, 1962 which was 

An Act to make temporary provision for controlling the immigration into the United Kingdom of Comrnon- wealth citizens; to authorise the deportation from the United Kingdom of certain Commonwealth citizens convicted of offences and recommended by the court for deportation; to amend the qualifications required of Commonwealth citizens applying for citizenship under the British Nationality Act, 1948; to make correspond- ing provisions in respect of British protected persons and citizens of the Republic of Ireland; and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid.  

The British Nationality Act, 1948, referred to in the 1962 Act, was not in itself injurious

An Act to make provision for British nationality and for citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid. 

The Labour Party won the 1964 Election with 317 Seats to the Conservatives 304. Not satisfied with its slim Majority, Prime Minister Harold Wilson called an Election in 1966 which gave Labour the huge Mandate of 354 Seats to the Tories' 253 Seats but did it repeal the Tories' 1962 prejudicial Act? No. The conventional Excuse for  the Labour Party in this Instance is that 'the People' wanted the Act in Place rather than accepting the Labour Party itself, generally at the Time, as a Reflection of the Attitude of 'the People', and in fact, conspicuously racist. 

We have witnessed how the United Kingdom (UK) tabloid Media have related to Meghan Markle since her Relationship with Prince Harry, third in Line to the British Throne, came out in the Open. To most of us of RAO we have noted the many prejudicial Ways in which these Media (Broadcast, Digital, Radio, Television and Print) have covered Stories regarding Ms Markle. These Instances have always been in stark Relief when we compared how the same Media Outlets celebrated similar Stories in respect of Kate Middleton, Partner to Harry's older Brother Prince William, second in Line to the British Throne. We have never been in any Doubt that Ms Markle was being treated detrimentally on racist Grounds based on the unschooled Conclusion that she is "Black." She is not actually that, but of mixed-Race Parentage. Her Mother is at first Glance of the RAO Group and her Father, at initial Indication, as of Occidental Lineage. The Fact(s) of Ms Markle's racial-mix has never been of Note to the tabloid Media. That she has 'black' in her is sufficient. The 'black' in her taints the 'white' Parts of her. However, we did not know what Meghan Markle and Partner Prince Harry were going through within the Royal Institution. How could we? We do not live within that Household. Our Understanding of the Royal Family comes from the Media. It is from these Outlets that we became acquainted with fallings-out among Members of the Family. 

When we, of RAO, watched the Interview Prince Harry and Meghan Markle did with Oprah Winfrey, many of the Things they said regarding Racism against them struck Chords with certain of us because they resemble much our various Experiences of Racism against us. This Impact was not the same for those who deny Racism in British Society, especially those who believe that Royalty cannot be racist. The Language of Racism in the Upper Classes of UK Society is one of Subtlety, as in Innuendos, in Speech and in Behaviour. We know the Signs and we detect the Symbolisms. Now then, am I claiming here that Queen Elizabeth II's Household is racist or that some Members are? Could I have implied somehow or be suggesting that all Occidentals are racist? My Answer to the first Question is "yes" for the Reasons I will give below. My Response to the second Question is "no." On the Question of whether the Royal Family is racist, I will say that since I have never had contact with that Family, my Conclusion of Racism extant in that Family is based on what Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, said in the televised Interview he and his Wife Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, had with Oprah Winfrey aired in March 2021. 

As an Aside, I am acquainted with Remarks by Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, which many have qualified as racist. I have never really paid Attention to Prince Philip's Comments as my Recognition of Racism differs a lot from what Others consider to be racist. For Instance, if Occidental Colleagues ostracise me at Work - Complaint most often brought before UK Courts as Demonstration of Racism - I would not be bothered in the least. For me, to me, it is welcomed-self-dumping-undesirables.  In the first Place, nobody has to like anybody at Work. Just get on with the Job, period. Of course, Racists do not possess the cognitive Maturity to just get on with the Job. They simply do not want you there earning a Living notwithstanding that you are probably at a Job much below your Merits. In the second Place, I do not consider racially-motivated Acts of Discrimination against me as necessarily Racism. I take them as 'Racialism' unless such Acts come from those with the Power and/or Influence to cause me Harm. It is when Harm - physical, practical, psychological - is involved that I would see it as Racism. Also, if you call me "N*****" I will not be offended. You call me that anyway, all the Time, and it is acceptable and accepted by Convention because you express it with the English 'black' rather than in the Latin 'Niger'. If you mock me with the Banana or as of the Ape Family - the Monkey especially - it confirms to me what I have always known you to be; an unevolved Specimen of Homosapiens. Why should I mind you if you are not educated to know that Human Origin is the Ape and that all Humans descended from the African? Tell you what? Racists do not like this Kind of Attitude of mine. It defeats their Objective of making you feel little, of resenting yourself, of wishing you were not born, of almost believing you are less than Human but I know the Basis of their false Confidence. Since the 16th Century they have convinced themselves of my mental Inferiority to them yet in this 21st Century, most of them are not one-tenth as educated as I am. They probably do not have a Bachelor's University Degree, which is the Minimum that I possess. So, how can you be mentally superior to me when you do not even have the Intelligence to get yourself a good Education and/or become an Entrepreneur? Here, I find handy the UK 1991 Census in which the Breakdowns confirmed Africans as the most educated and professionally qualified in our Society. When you put this Reality together with Figures for Others of the RAO Group, the Picture is so crystal clear that there is nothing wrong with the cognitive Capability of the RAO Group. The following Census of 2001 ran away from again confirming this Truth as, probably subsequent Censuses too. The Delusion of Superiority has to be maintained, so the collective-Self-Deceit continues. My Attitude gets our Racists really mad at you - if it is your Attitude too - whom they wished to disorient with their Conduct of 'Mental Retardation', now making them realize how much of Nonentities they are. You are showing them that you so mentally surpass them. Their primitive Cognition does get given serious pounding that you could so confidently not be perturbed by their collective-conspiratorial-Harassment. On the Question of all Occidentals as racist, I would argue that such Presumption is fundamentally unfair and unwise, and again some might just be Racialists. I am aware that most will contend that Racialism and Racism mean the same Thing. Well, I am not going to lecture anyone here on the Distinction. 

When Prince Harry claims that someone in his Royal Household pondered to him during his Wife Meghan Markle's Pregnancy how "black" or "dark" his Son Archie would be when born, I know that it is clearly Racism from the Mind of the Racist I have described earlier. Concern about Archie looking more African that Occidental suggested Rejection of that Child as a Member of the Royal Family. Common Observation tells us that if a 'black-white' mixed-Race Person has a Child with a 'white' Person, the Child will be closer in Appearance to the Occidental. On the other Hand, if a 'black-white' mixed-Race Person has a Child with a 'black' Person, the Child will be closer in Appearance to the African. The Rejection of Archie as a Royal is reflected in the Harm of taking away from him his natural-born Right to be called 'Prince'. This Right is not a Grant. It is not a Gift. It is an Entitlement by Virtue of his Birth. Would the reasonable Mind not ask the sensible Question of why a naturally-born Prince is proscribed by the Royal Family from being identified by that Description? After all, the Children of Prince William and Ms Middleton bear the Titles of ‘Prince’ and ‘Princess’. What makes these Children special over Archie? Nevermind, we know. 

Queen Elizabeth II - born 1926 - had the Title of ‘Princess’ when her Father – George – was not the King but Edward III – abdicated 1936 – his older Brother. So, why was Queen Elizabeth II 'Princess Elizabeth' when there was not even the slightest Possibility, she would ever become Queen? She had the Title of 'Princess' because it was her natural-born Right just as it is Archie's and the future Children of Meghan and Harry. 

I am aware that what I have written here is completely of no Benefit to the unreasonable Person. It is especially so because such a Person has yet to evolve mentally into the modern Homosapien. The developed Cognition seeks to either hear both Sides of a Disagreement or triangulate the only Side heard in order to reach something close to a sensible Conclusion. You do not revel in one Version of the Disagreement but dismiss as Lies the other Version when you were never opportuned to have witnessed the Circumstances of the Disagreement yourself. What does that say about your mental Disposition? Then to justify your Irrationality, you pertuate it with further Perversity. Again, we are all acquainted, all over the World, with the Story that close to the Marriage of the Sussexes, Ms Markle made Ms Middleton cry. The British tabloid Media had field Days in interpreting the Occurrence as how awful Ms Markle was to Ms Middleton and how generally unpleasant she is anyway. Now, Ms Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, tells us it actually was the other Way round, that it was Ms Middleton, the Duchess of Cambridge, who had made her cry, the racist Media became unrighteously angered calling her all Sorts of Names. Why is that? Nevermind, we know why. 

Endnote

1My "recent African Origin" (RAO) expresses my Recognition that Human Life began in Africa and that all Human Beings are Africans therefore. The RAO is that Human who remains African in Race Taxonomy.

2Read Abraham Lincoln's Notes before his Proclamation in S.E. Morison, H.S. Commager, & W.E. Leuchtenburg, A Concise History of the American Republic, New York: Oxford University Press, 1977. I am not able to provide an Excerpt. I packed my Books away some Years ago in Anticipation of selling my Property and have not unpacked them since. 

Ipemndoh dan Iyan PhM©

AsimauGlobalMedia© 

All Rights 2021©

April 5